At the end of my last article, There’s a New Shot on the Block, we saw that the UK’s regulator showed no evidence of actively investigating reports of serious and even fatal side effects from the novel vaccines they had “enabled” onto the market. In the same period that our regulator did nothing, scientists around the world stepped up. Their work was rarely - if ever - acknowledged, and instead of being thanked for picking up the slack where the regulators had failed, they were relentlessly attacked and silenced.
As early as the 16th of February 2021, there were studies appearing that suggested a link between the mRNA vaccines and myocarditis. Alon Nevet published a case study in which a healthy patient developed myocarditis after the Pfizer jab. “A high index of suspicion should be maintained” he argued, later stating that “further research is required in order to explore the significance of this phenomenon.”
By the end of the month, two more case studies had appeared, one from Spain, and one from Italy. On the latter, it was by Ammirati et al in which a 56 year old presented with acute myocarditis following the second dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer) vaccine. The diagnosis was confirmed with MRI, and the patient was discharged after 7 days with a good long term prognosis.
Three years later, we’re still in limbo over this exact issue. In fact, it’s now looking possible that the MHRA will be investigated for failing to act. How this squares with these products remaining on the market whilst that investigation takes place is anyone’s guess, but this is the world we live in now….
So just how much information and scientific data was available, and remains available, to regulators or scientists with a stake in vaccine safety? The answer, obviously, is a lot.
The best compilation of this data I’ve thus far seen has come from
who meticulously compiled 3,665 case studies, taking him perhaps 1000 hours. It’s testament to the twin tracks of reality our society finds itself on, where one track argues viscerally that no problems with the novel vaccine exist and “there’s no evidence otherwise”, whilst the other track has accumulated 3,600 scientific papers which demonstrate the exact opposite.But how is any one person supposed to be across such a huge corpus of data? Well…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The Digger to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.