The full Ivermectin series now sharable for all

If you’ve not yet read the full series I put together on Ivermectin, now is your chance. Most of the series was free, but there were parts that sat behind a wall. I’ve added a table of contents to keep readers informed of their progress and I’m removing all walls from series until Tuesday next week. If you have friends or family that you’d like to share the series with, now is a good time.

1. Ivermectin Part 1: The Very Unusual Paper

2. Ivermectin Part 2: A Very Unusual Business

3. Ivermectin Part 3: The People Behind the Curtain

   1. Part 1: An Unacknowledged Influence

   2. Part 2: The Conflicts of Interest of those who discredited Ivermectin

   3. Part 3: Who is Andrew Owen?

4. Ivermectin Part 4: Censorship, controversy and attacks

A quicker summary

The ‘quick’ summary of Ivermectin has been sharable from the beginning, so here’s me reminding you it’s there. It’s useful for people who are totally fresh, or for people who just want to move through the nuts and bolts of it quickly.

Ivermectin and 'a very powerful lobby'. A summary.

The Can’t Add TOGETHER Trial

A huge trial came out looking at Ivermectin, it’s called the TOGETHER trial. Many people suspected there would be problems with the trial, but few were prepared for the number of issues that have been discovered. This post went out to paid subscribers over the weekend but is now available for free subscribers.

The Can't Add TOGETHER Trial

Creating an audience and supporting my work

I hugely appreciate each and every subscriber, both paid and free on this substack. Your support is making this work possible. Put simply, if you weren’t supporting me, I’d be doing something else, so if my work is having an impact, it’s your support that’s fuelling it.

As many of you know, there is no audience for this content. Ascribing efficacy to Ivermectin is (for now) banned from both Twitter and YouTube because it contradicts WHO policy. It doesn’t matter that Ivermectin has been shown to be effective, all that matters to social media content police is WHO policy. It means we’re living in an asymmetrical information ecosystem that creates the illusion of consensus over the issue of early treatment.

As such, the audience for this work can only exist if we all build it together. That probably starts in instant messenger or email chats with our friends and family.

What’s next

There is so much to unpack with the TOGETHER trial that I’ll be putting some more energy into it. One thing that caught my eye are commentators (you know who you are) being baffled as to why Ivermectin advocates ‘are mad’ over the TOGETHER trial. I think I’ll detail ‘why’ in some detail…

I will trial a model of posting my content to paid subscribers first. I’m finding the dialogue I can have ‘behind the wall’ quite useful, some posts are subscriber-only, so if you’re interested to be a part of that, please do consider becoming a paid subscriber and supporting investigative journalism.