15 Comments
User's avatar
Dr Christopher Exley's avatar

I am sure you are aware of our published paper on Mitkus et al., see https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0162013417303380?via%3Dihub

Sconnie's avatar

Brilliant article, very readable and understandable for those of us without a strong scientific background. And brilliant work by Dr Exley, too.

Lisa Novakowski's avatar

How about not having aluminum in medical products? I also think vaccines as they stand are toxic.

Mike Casey's avatar

“Unavoidably Unsafe”: The Lie That Eliminated Alternatives

“Unavoidably unsafe” is the phrase the pharmaceutical industry used to justify legal immunity for vaccines. That immunity was granted under the assumption that vaccines were the only possible way to prevent infectious disease—and that no safe alternative could exist.

That assumption was the lie.

On the basis of that lie, pharmaceutical companies were granted blanket immunity, fear was manufactured, and millions were injected with toxic chemical mixtures. The number of recommended vaccines steadily increased—eventually approaching 100—under the promise that Pharma would act responsibly, prioritize safety, and serve the common good.

We now know that did not happen.

Instead, Pharma leveraged immunity to generate billions in profits, without proving long-term safety or effectiveness. Aluminum, mercury, and other toxic adjuvants were added with little concern for cumulative harm. The result was a documented cascade of harm, while dissent was silenced and compliance was demanded in the name of “the science.” A cult-like culture of universal vaccination replaced honest scientific debate.

All of this rested on a false premise: that no safe, effective alternative to vaccines exists.

The Suppressed Alternative

A safe, organic, effective alternative does exist. It is inexpensive, simple to use, and capable of preventing infection. It has been deliberately ignored, vilified, and suppressed for decades.

That alternative is ozone water.

Have you ever heard of it? Do you know anything about it? Most people don’t—and that is not accidental.

The Facts

Ozone and ozone water destroy viruses and bacteria instantly through oxidation, leaving no toxic residue. This is not opinion. The FDA and the EPA both recognize ozone as a powerful and effective disinfectant.

In 2001, the FDA approved ozone and ozone water for culinary disinfection and as a safe food additive. According to FDA guidance, ozone water can be used to disinfect everything in a food environment—meat, fish, produce, utensils, countertops, floors, walls, and drains.

Yet the moment ozone water’s disinfecting power is applied to medical or personal health use, it is declared “unsafe.”

That contradiction makes sense only if you are protecting pharmaceutical profits and legal immunity—because acknowledging a universal, non-patentable alternative would collapse the entire vaccine model.

The Harm Is Now Visible

Pharma itself admits vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.” The consequences are now impossible to ignore. Millions are dead or suffer from vaccine injuries, autism, aggressive cancers, and chronic disease. Dozens of once-recommended vaccines have just been removed from required schedules, yet the industry continues searching for the “perfect vaccine,” while the existing alternative remains suppressed.

Taking Back Control

Ozone water is not illegal. There are no laws preventing you from using ozone for your own health.

You can take control today.

Ozone generators for water are readily available. Learn how to use them. Drink ozone water. Spray it on your body. Disinfect your environment. Use it daily—and you may find that sickness no longer takes hold.

Prevention does not require permission.

Good health, wellness, and vitality are within your control.

Embrace ozone water. Start today.

Graham's avatar

The toxicity of Al is one issue, a second is the way it triggers the immune response, at least around the injection site, and where it leaks to. The immune system sees the irritation as damage, and go on the hunt for the problem. That increases the response to the antigen like trigger (it makes the vaccine do its job - more so), but it also increases the response to anything else, and quite likely it knows it doesn't know.

We dont know what triggers auto-immune problems, what makes the body attack itself, or perhaps (say) peanut allergies, or any allergy. If the body detects something, figures out it wasnt the first antigen, and blames the second thing, maybe you have a new problem, with the entire weight of the immune system, pointing in the wrong direction.

Jonathan Norris's avatar

Thank you, an extraordinary and jaw dropping article. The existence alone of Dialysis Dementia is a black swan to a claim that Al is safe. The conclusions from investigating the phenomenon and the research into pre-term babies is shocking. I am baffled how this can be the first time I have heard of either of these. In the context of Girouard's Bolus theory, the distinction between intra muscular injection and IV disappears, instead it becomes an explanation of why only some individuals are affected, and to different degrees. It serves to make the impacts of Al, once it becomes IV, more clearly defined.

Mark Seager's avatar

Assuming the baby weighs 14lb and an average doctor weighs 14 stone (about 200lb) maybe we need to challenge doctors to take a dose of 2640mcg intravenously as most medicines are dosed by weight.

I bet very few would queue up for it and even fewer would be compis mentis for a second dose.

Which_way_is_up?'s avatar

Am I correct that the study also pointed out that the 1/2 life of the aluminum was calculated at 7years?

How much more aluminum is injected that would be accumulating over that time?

This is INSANE!

Tardigrade's avatar

Aluminum beverage cans are lined with plastic. Reusable water bottles, I don't know, but I wouldn't call those "soft drink bottles".

Also, as this Digger article points out, 99% of ingested aluminum is not absorbed.

Indrek Sarapuu's avatar

Agreed, but as a food label reader, I refuse to buy the most popular biscuit mix...

Tardigrade's avatar

I wasn't implying that I think ingesting aluminum is OK. I stopped using aluminum cooking pans many years ago.

Not sure why you refer to biscuit mix, unless you're talking about the aluminum component in some baking powders. I stopped eating grains 15 years ago, so the biscuit mix example is lost on me ;)

Indrek Sarapuu's avatar

I believe it's aluminum phosphate, as an anti-caking agent.

All I'm saying, is I avoid anything with aluminum on the label.

Dr Christopher Exley's avatar

If you are genuinely interested in learning something about aluminium then you might start with Dr's Newsletter, see https://drchristopherexley.substack.com/