Effect found in men aged 18-39
Dr. Lapado is the propagandists' worst nightmare—a fierce truth-teller with an inconvenient skin color for their narrative and standard kafkatrapping tactics.
Dr. Ladapo and Governor DeSantis need to declare these poison injections BANNED in FLORIDA. He needs to take the lead for all the other Governors that are too cowardly. He must do this or he is just as guilty of murder as all the others involved.
It is a shame that a more direct route to the wholesale abandonment of these injections couldn’t have been found. I did offer unequivocal evidence to that effect many months ago.
We’ve had to wait to see the bodies pile up & immense suffering to have been visited upon millions of innocent people before even tentative statements were made.
It seems this is as fast as is possible. It’s disappointing nonetheless & leaves a bad taste.
Also note there is job protection for those in Florida not wanting the jab. https://www.floridahealth.gov/
The State Surgeon General now recommends against the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for males
ages 18-39 years old.
It's just too late for so many young men. A lawsuit does not and will not improve their health.
My first time hearing about Dr Lapado was this week. I'm beginning to like him.
Good news indeed.
Side note: I talked to a radiology tech today, 10.7.22. He said the imaging center he works at is swamped. They are “triple and quadruple” booking appointments. He could only speak to appts for the CT/PET scanner as he works with that particular machine. No surprise to anyone on this page I’m sure.
Woah! Talking about deaths and not just myocarditis is a massive step forward for the truth to become common knowledge.
Best Surgeon General ever!!
Phil you’ve done some excellent work on the original vaccine trial data which is very compelling.
However, in regards to the Florida paper, when I first saw the paper I had some reservations.
To me, the benefit claimed wasn’t readily discernible from the numbers presented.
Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz has analysed the paper and perhaps somewhat predictably has drawn different conclusions and despite whatever you think of him, he does appear to make some good points.
Perhaps Phil you could do a deep dive into the stats presented in the paper much in the same way you have done for the Pfizer vaccine trial?