8 Comments
User's avatar
Guilherme Succi's avatar

We know ivermectin works for treating covid. So sad to see that there are doctors playing hard against saving patients lives. The truth will prevail. Unfortunately it will be too late for hundreds of thousands families that lost their loved ones without adequate treatment.

Anon's avatar

Problem is Phil, if any of the regulatory bodies suddenly came out and said there is now enough data to recommend IVM for use then they’d be under scrutiny as to why now and not 18 months ago when the previous studies also suggested a benefit?

Those that have suffered over the last 18 months then might quite rightly want compensation. So trust me, it will never happen. Hopefully there is a passive back down whereby doctors are free to prescibe it without punishment. That’s about as good as anyone can hope for

GalaxyWhoop's avatar

But there is another problem that nobody is talking about. There are studies showing that Ivermectin might be a cure for cancer. Search "Ivermectin Cancer". I suspect the drug companies have known this for a long time and are willing to do anything to suppress generic Ivermectin for that reason.

GalaxyWhoop's avatar

Imagine the headlines: "People so stupid that they are attempting to use horse paste to treat their cancer."

Roslyn Davidson's avatar

Great in depth work Phil with Alex to expose the problems with ivermectin research. Thank you.

John's avatar

It seems clear that the medical industry regards the open scientific process as a nuisance. It has it's own internal investigation/decision processes and treats the academic scientific process as legacy.

Lorraine Logie's avatar

Sorry to be pedantic but you need to proof read your articles for credibility.