If I wanted a meta-analysis to give poor results, I'd select the same studies. Many studies are missing. Having Lopez-Medina and Vallejos as the only studies to evaluate all-cause mortality in "community setting"... that's quite "efficient"! (For both of them, there are reasons to suspect parts of the control groups had taken ivermectin, either during or not long before the trial.)
Besides, how strange to separate "hospital setting" from "community setting", rather than "early treatment" from "late treatment" or "mild Covid" from "severe Covid" for instance...
If I wanted a meta-analysis to give poor results, I'd select the same studies. Many studies are missing. Having Lopez-Medina and Vallejos as the only studies to evaluate all-cause mortality in "community setting"... that's quite "efficient"! (For both of them, there are reasons to suspect parts of the control groups had taken ivermectin, either during or not long before the trial.)
Besides, how strange to separate "hospital setting" from "community setting", rather than "early treatment" from "late treatment" or "mild Covid" from "severe Covid" for instance...
Great to see you seeking and finding evidence to explain the unexplainable. Please keep up the digging. For the sake of truth it is essential.
Can't call you Sherlock until Hill and Owen are prosecuted. Good start though.
Make sure to follow me on Twitter please. Subscribe to you On substack Shannon’s Ire. https://mrshannonrachford.substack.com/c1b6068e-d580-4efc-a39a-cef1a75421a8 will give you a kick on Twit. Thanks brother.