*Correction: mRNA is still actively producing spike protein for AT LEAST 2 months, not "up to" 2 months.
The arbitrary 2 month window closed because that was the scope of the research project, not because spike generation stopped. Important distinction, we don't know how long the mRNA stays active, thanks to the overspecification using psuedouridine. It's more durable than needed or expected. Real testing would have caught this.
I thought there was research quoted some time ago, from 17 months after vax, that showed there was still spike production in the lymph nodes. Again, that was the time elapsed after the vax, so it could have continued on after that study stopped.
they found replication competent spike inside lymph nodes 17 months after vax, and that was how much time had elapsed after the people in the study were jabbed. That has been some time ago, and I don't know if someone was keeping current with the study.
Thank you!! Sharing! Visuals are powerful learning tools. For those who need sound bites, the MRI imagery gives one extreme pause for thought. More like red flashing lights. This would make for a very effective meme. Frightening but needed.
Agreed. One quibble: the imagery I believe you are referring to (demonstrating rapid disease progression after vaccine booster) is actually a PET scan (positron emission tomography). And, yes, it demonstrates dramatic progression of that patient’s lymphoma. Frightening, indeed.
Thank you! I whipped out MRI and wondered about that but didn’t verify. Was too agitated!!
I know of someone who had been in remission for quite some time. Just recently was diagnosed with a lymphatic cancer (not his previous cancer). Doctors were shocked. Don’t know him well enough to scream “Don’t get boosted”. He and his wife are vaccine worshippers as well. It’s just so upsetting to watch this.
An acquaintance, a young healthy woman, just developed rheumatoid arthritis. Doctors baffled. At least with her I could implore her to not get boosted. Another friend had a huge flare up with his thyroid issues, he swears it was from his booster.
Little wonder why Jabhead resigned and Whitty/Vallance.VanTam have gone rather quiet.
Crooked collusion throughout this debacle. They are all fawning around the funeral of QE11 but the image of our monarch all alone in her grief at the funeral of her husband is still embedded in my mind.!!! OFF WITH THEIR HEADS.!
"To expand that out a bit, the mRNA vaccines use a novel gene technology (lipid nano-particles) to hijack our cell’s ability to manufacture proteins. The vaccine ‘requests’ our cells manufacture the Spike protein, which is just one small part of the full SARS-CoV-2 virus. Then our immune system stages an immune response to this apparent Spike invader, the theory being that our immune system will then recognise ‘the real’ virus when it finally arrives. At the heart of the safety issue McCullough is exploring, is the Spike protein itself, they argue that it “is neurotoxic and it impairs DNA repair mechanisms”."
Few important things: The mRNA injections ARE the novel GENE THERAPY, with one and the same SYNTHETICALLY derived, PATENTED genetic seqeunce! WHoever can grasp that fact alone, should end up with goose skin, literally. The term 'vaccines' was CRIMINALLY changed now including GENE THERAPIES ON THE ENTIRE HUMANITY! That I call a total deception, and I include into that category every single publication which talks about covid 'vaccines'! PLEASE check out:
for more detailed insight. The one basic thing should be realized, normally we get infected from OUTSIDE, i.e. by exposure of outer portion of specific cells to the infectious agents, but now with the synthetic mRNA injections, that happens from the OPPOSITE DIRECTION, inside of the cell is becoming the infectious agent, and now not only the specific cells, like mucus, but every single cell which is penetrated by nanolipids. That means many,many MORE CELLS ARE 'BECOMING THE VIRUS'. The best illustration of this fact are autopsy pictures of tissues immunologically stained for the presence of SPike protein. Apparently, the SPike production continues even after the death!??? That goes beyond what any normal human could stand, literally. My last post is about that:
Thank you for breaking this down. The scientific papers are difficult to interpret for the layperson and not easy to share with people who remain stubbornly unaware of concerns about the shots.
'“It hasn’t been proven in a clinical trial….because we don’t have time to do a clinical trial!” There was no pushback to this absurdity.'
Every time I think our world has strayed as far from what makes sense as possible, I'm proven wrong. At this point, I can only hope that I will wake up soon from this apparent nightmare.
“There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.
"There is another theory which states that this has already happened.”
― Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
And yet... reading Facebook comments on the page of a quadruple vaccinated now covid positive friend, commenters saying how glad they were for the vaccine because it “saved them” from severe illness. Astounding.
I heard a clergyman, who was heavily involved in AA, talk about how deep an addiction can be, including that he'd seen people with livers so swollen they visibly protruded who were adamantly unwilling to let go of their bottle of liquor, because it was their only comfort in life.
Wow, thank you for this summary. It’s so helpful as I’m compiling my list of data and studies to present up my husband. These references studies are very helpful as well. Thank you
In this paper, These are all the things that would have been addressed to some various extent , if these mRNA inocula had not been pushed into clinical human trials and marketed in the fashion that they were: inadequate or nonexistent animal studies, pharmacodynamics and distribution data, long term(more than 2-6 weeks) observations, etc. Even with reasonable time frames for some vaccines , (like rotavirus vax), intusseception was not discovered until quite a while after the injections in infants began. So be prepared for many adverse events. The big difference now, is that adverse events are willfully ignored and covered up.
.....and the date was hidden from us by Big Pharma from the beginning. You make a good point of the adverse events being ignored or covered up but the Pfizer docs who they knew all along what this jab (not a vaccine) was capable of. Off with their Heads!
"A recent early-release study has found that the mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines can be detected long after the vaccine is administered. It continues to make spike glycoprotein up to sixty days post-vaccination (Röltgen et al., 2022)."
Should this be "at least sixty days?" Sometimes these durations reflect that the study was stopped, e.g., after sixty days.
I quoted exactly. What the authors mean is that it can be detected up to at least 60 days. This is because in their case, they measured it over 60 days and it was detected over 60 days.
Hence 'at least'. It could actually be there for longer, we just haven't measured for that yet.
Thank you for this piece of work on summarizing the paper. The research is of great value - if only the authors could get notice taken of it from the people who should be taking notice!
My particular interest is to do with blood transfusions, the spike protein, its persistence, and cellular damage. Although I'm not a science person, I'm in physical education and therefore understand enough about the human body to understand enough of the relevant science.
In the UK, when a person donates blood, they are not asked about their vaccination status - if they've been vaccinated, with which vaccine, how many doses, if they've had adverse reactions. They are just asked if they've had Covid. I wrote to ask this of the NHS Blood Transfusion Service. They also trotted out the line about the body expelling the mRNA soon after vaccination.
As an unvaccinated person, in the event of an emergency, I do not want a blood transfusion from a Covid vaccinated person. I have had my doctor put this on my medical record. Vaccination information should be collected from blood donors- it would not take much extra effort. However, I suppose it would be tantamount to an admission on the authorities' part that there might be a problem!
Leaving aside all the growing scientific body of evidence that there could be a problem with this, there is also the question of ethics and my right to choose my treatment. There is also much evidence from embalmers in the US, who have found very strange blood clots in vaccinated dead peoples' blood vessels, the likes of which have never been seen before. Doctors have noticed also that, in the vaccinated, red blood corpuscles are clumping together to make clots.
I shall continue to write to the Blood Transfusion Service until, hopefully, I get satisfaction.
Let's hope we don't have another scandal as we had with HIV-infected blood...
My husband regularly donates blood in the USA via Red Cross. When the shots first came out, they asked about vaccine status...fir a few months. Then, they stopped.
Hmm...I suspect they realised they were opening a can of worms as new damning evidence about the vaccines started trickling in. I don't think they've ever done it here - no doubt for the same reason.
*Correction: mRNA is still actively producing spike protein for AT LEAST 2 months, not "up to" 2 months.
The arbitrary 2 month window closed because that was the scope of the research project, not because spike generation stopped. Important distinction, we don't know how long the mRNA stays active, thanks to the overspecification using psuedouridine. It's more durable than needed or expected. Real testing would have caught this.
Apparently this is research-speak -- they can say for sure what happens up to 60 days out, and whereof they have no data, thereof they must be silent.
It's because it's not 'at least'. It's 'up to at least'.
To explain it another way, your body may well break it down in 10 days, and its gone. But someone else doesn't break it down for 60 days.
'Up to at least' accommodates both - in some it might be gone, but for sure it has been detected for sixty days.
The phrase is a tricky one, but once I thought about it enough I figured what they meant by it was correct.
I thought there was research quoted some time ago, from 17 months after vax, that showed there was still spike production in the lymph nodes. Again, that was the time elapsed after the vax, so it could have continued on after that study stopped.
Bruce Patterson did that I believe.
I remember seeing this too
There's probably a systematic way to search for research based on a memory like that.
I don't know the method. But surely it's done all the time.
Exactly right! We still don't know how long the spike remains active. My guess is that it's much much longer than 2 months.
they found replication competent spike inside lymph nodes 17 months after vax, and that was how much time had elapsed after the people in the study were jabbed. That has been some time ago, and I don't know if someone was keeping current with the study.
Holy shite! Couldn't be happier to be a Pureblood. Hoping I never need a blood transfusion in future.
Phil, the other authors listed on that paper are well known in the research field, and deserve a line on their professional qualifications.
Got it.
Thank you!! Sharing! Visuals are powerful learning tools. For those who need sound bites, the MRI imagery gives one extreme pause for thought. More like red flashing lights. This would make for a very effective meme. Frightening but needed.
Agreed. One quibble: the imagery I believe you are referring to (demonstrating rapid disease progression after vaccine booster) is actually a PET scan (positron emission tomography). And, yes, it demonstrates dramatic progression of that patient’s lymphoma. Frightening, indeed.
Thank you! I whipped out MRI and wondered about that but didn’t verify. Was too agitated!!
I know of someone who had been in remission for quite some time. Just recently was diagnosed with a lymphatic cancer (not his previous cancer). Doctors were shocked. Don’t know him well enough to scream “Don’t get boosted”. He and his wife are vaccine worshippers as well. It’s just so upsetting to watch this.
An acquaintance, a young healthy woman, just developed rheumatoid arthritis. Doctors baffled. At least with her I could implore her to not get boosted. Another friend had a huge flare up with his thyroid issues, he swears it was from his booster.
The list goes on.
This is a living nightmare
Where the hell is the outrage? WHERE IS IT???
Thank you for your work and highlighting the imagery from the study in Frontiers (midway in your post). Very effective. I will be sharing.
Little wonder why Jabhead resigned and Whitty/Vallance.VanTam have gone rather quiet.
Crooked collusion throughout this debacle. They are all fawning around the funeral of QE11 but the image of our monarch all alone in her grief at the funeral of her husband is still embedded in my mind.!!! OFF WITH THEIR HEADS.!
It seems that one cannot share this research paper on Facebook without the ‘fact checkers’ slapping their warning on it.
Quite frightening, really.
"To expand that out a bit, the mRNA vaccines use a novel gene technology (lipid nano-particles) to hijack our cell’s ability to manufacture proteins. The vaccine ‘requests’ our cells manufacture the Spike protein, which is just one small part of the full SARS-CoV-2 virus. Then our immune system stages an immune response to this apparent Spike invader, the theory being that our immune system will then recognise ‘the real’ virus when it finally arrives. At the heart of the safety issue McCullough is exploring, is the Spike protein itself, they argue that it “is neurotoxic and it impairs DNA repair mechanisms”."
Few important things: The mRNA injections ARE the novel GENE THERAPY, with one and the same SYNTHETICALLY derived, PATENTED genetic seqeunce! WHoever can grasp that fact alone, should end up with goose skin, literally. The term 'vaccines' was CRIMINALLY changed now including GENE THERAPIES ON THE ENTIRE HUMANITY! That I call a total deception, and I include into that category every single publication which talks about covid 'vaccines'! PLEASE check out:
https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/why-covid-injections-are-not-vaccines
or
https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/why-cdcfda-ignore-the-spike-protein
for more detailed insight. The one basic thing should be realized, normally we get infected from OUTSIDE, i.e. by exposure of outer portion of specific cells to the infectious agents, but now with the synthetic mRNA injections, that happens from the OPPOSITE DIRECTION, inside of the cell is becoming the infectious agent, and now not only the specific cells, like mucus, but every single cell which is penetrated by nanolipids. That means many,many MORE CELLS ARE 'BECOMING THE VIRUS'. The best illustration of this fact are autopsy pictures of tissues immunologically stained for the presence of SPike protein. Apparently, the SPike production continues even after the death!??? That goes beyond what any normal human could stand, literally. My last post is about that:
https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/synthetic-modified-mrna-a-new-tomorrow
Thank you for breaking this down. The scientific papers are difficult to interpret for the layperson and not easy to share with people who remain stubbornly unaware of concerns about the shots.
'“It hasn’t been proven in a clinical trial….because we don’t have time to do a clinical trial!” There was no pushback to this absurdity.'
Every time I think our world has strayed as far from what makes sense as possible, I'm proven wrong. At this point, I can only hope that I will wake up soon from this apparent nightmare.
“There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.
"There is another theory which states that this has already happened.”
― Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
Let's all get rich by declaring the leaf legal tender, then deal with the inevitable inflation problem by burning the forests.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/685739-if-the-management-consultant-said-tersely-we-could-for-a
+10 for the quote from my personal deity.
And yet... reading Facebook comments on the page of a quadruple vaccinated now covid positive friend, commenters saying how glad they were for the vaccine because it “saved them” from severe illness. Astounding.
They've been given that straw to grasp, and they have a death grip with both hands.
Most of my friends parrot the same line.
I heard a clergyman, who was heavily involved in AA, talk about how deep an addiction can be, including that he'd seen people with livers so swollen they visibly protruded who were adamantly unwilling to let go of their bottle of liquor, because it was their only comfort in life.
Wow, thank you for this summary. It’s so helpful as I’m compiling my list of data and studies to present up my husband. These references studies are very helpful as well. Thank you
In this paper, These are all the things that would have been addressed to some various extent , if these mRNA inocula had not been pushed into clinical human trials and marketed in the fashion that they were: inadequate or nonexistent animal studies, pharmacodynamics and distribution data, long term(more than 2-6 weeks) observations, etc. Even with reasonable time frames for some vaccines , (like rotavirus vax), intusseception was not discovered until quite a while after the injections in infants began. So be prepared for many adverse events. The big difference now, is that adverse events are willfully ignored and covered up.
.....and the date was hidden from us by Big Pharma from the beginning. You make a good point of the adverse events being ignored or covered up but the Pfizer docs who they knew all along what this jab (not a vaccine) was capable of. Off with their Heads!
Thanks for your effort and information. I wiil share this.
"A recent early-release study has found that the mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines can be detected long after the vaccine is administered. It continues to make spike glycoprotein up to sixty days post-vaccination (Röltgen et al., 2022)."
Should this be "at least sixty days?" Sometimes these durations reflect that the study was stopped, e.g., after sixty days.
I quoted exactly. What the authors mean is that it can be detected up to at least 60 days. This is because in their case, they measured it over 60 days and it was detected over 60 days.
Hence 'at least'. It could actually be there for longer, we just haven't measured for that yet.
Got it. I tend to read things a bit too literally sometimes, and it's good to know the local linguistic conventions. Thank you.
Thank you for this piece of work on summarizing the paper. The research is of great value - if only the authors could get notice taken of it from the people who should be taking notice!
My particular interest is to do with blood transfusions, the spike protein, its persistence, and cellular damage. Although I'm not a science person, I'm in physical education and therefore understand enough about the human body to understand enough of the relevant science.
In the UK, when a person donates blood, they are not asked about their vaccination status - if they've been vaccinated, with which vaccine, how many doses, if they've had adverse reactions. They are just asked if they've had Covid. I wrote to ask this of the NHS Blood Transfusion Service. They also trotted out the line about the body expelling the mRNA soon after vaccination.
As an unvaccinated person, in the event of an emergency, I do not want a blood transfusion from a Covid vaccinated person. I have had my doctor put this on my medical record. Vaccination information should be collected from blood donors- it would not take much extra effort. However, I suppose it would be tantamount to an admission on the authorities' part that there might be a problem!
Leaving aside all the growing scientific body of evidence that there could be a problem with this, there is also the question of ethics and my right to choose my treatment. There is also much evidence from embalmers in the US, who have found very strange blood clots in vaccinated dead peoples' blood vessels, the likes of which have never been seen before. Doctors have noticed also that, in the vaccinated, red blood corpuscles are clumping together to make clots.
I shall continue to write to the Blood Transfusion Service until, hopefully, I get satisfaction.
Let's hope we don't have another scandal as we had with HIV-infected blood...
I would also like to add two relevant links to my above comments:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/embalmers-have-been-finding-numerous-long-fibrous-clots-that-lack-post-mortem-characteristics_4696015.html?welcomeuser=1
https://www.theepochtimes.com/italian-study-blood-patients-after-mrna-shot_4708049.html?utm_source=healthnoe&utm_campaign=health-2022-09-07-2&utm_medium=email&est=lkTA0R%2FpAPZTRUeB52r3m8zunQ8SV78s0ARwQr1U%2B3hTr3JNUR1FHNTXQZYNRRUCffTshw%3D%3D
Hope they work.
My husband regularly donates blood in the USA via Red Cross. When the shots first came out, they asked about vaccine status...fir a few months. Then, they stopped.
Hmm...I suspect they realised they were opening a can of worms as new damning evidence about the vaccines started trickling in. I don't think they've ever done it here - no doubt for the same reason.
Thank you Phil for a sterling effort.