65 Comments

*Correction: mRNA is still actively producing spike protein for AT LEAST 2 months, not "up to" 2 months.

The arbitrary 2 month window closed because that was the scope of the research project, not because spike generation stopped. Important distinction, we don't know how long the mRNA stays active, thanks to the overspecification using psuedouridine. It's more durable than needed or expected. Real testing would have caught this.

Expand full comment
Sep 14, 2022Liked by Phil Harper

Phil, the other authors listed on that paper are well known in the research field, and deserve a line on their professional qualifications.

Expand full comment

Thank you!! Sharing! Visuals are powerful learning tools. For those who need sound bites, the MRI imagery gives one extreme pause for thought. More like red flashing lights. This would make for a very effective meme. Frightening but needed.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your work and highlighting the imagery from the study in Frontiers (midway in your post). Very effective. I will be sharing.

Expand full comment

Little wonder why Jabhead resigned and Whitty/Vallance.VanTam have gone rather quiet.

Crooked collusion throughout this debacle. They are all fawning around the funeral of QE11 but the image of our monarch all alone in her grief at the funeral of her husband is still embedded in my mind.!!! OFF WITH THEIR HEADS.!

Expand full comment

It seems that one cannot share this research paper on Facebook without the ‘fact checkers’ slapping their warning on it.

Quite frightening, really.

Expand full comment

"To expand that out a bit, the mRNA vaccines use a novel gene technology (lipid nano-particles) to hijack our cell’s ability to manufacture proteins. The vaccine ‘requests’ our cells manufacture the Spike protein, which is just one small part of the full SARS-CoV-2 virus. Then our immune system stages an immune response to this apparent Spike invader, the theory being that our immune system will then recognise ‘the real’ virus when it finally arrives. At the heart of the safety issue McCullough is exploring, is the Spike protein itself, they argue that it “is neurotoxic and it impairs DNA repair mechanisms”."

Few important things: The mRNA injections ARE the novel GENE THERAPY, with one and the same SYNTHETICALLY derived, PATENTED genetic seqeunce! WHoever can grasp that fact alone, should end up with goose skin, literally. The term 'vaccines' was CRIMINALLY changed now including GENE THERAPIES ON THE ENTIRE HUMANITY! That I call a total deception, and I include into that category every single publication which talks about covid 'vaccines'! PLEASE check out:

https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/why-covid-injections-are-not-vaccines

or

https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/why-cdcfda-ignore-the-spike-protein

for more detailed insight. The one basic thing should be realized, normally we get infected from OUTSIDE, i.e. by exposure of outer portion of specific cells to the infectious agents, but now with the synthetic mRNA injections, that happens from the OPPOSITE DIRECTION, inside of the cell is becoming the infectious agent, and now not only the specific cells, like mucus, but every single cell which is penetrated by nanolipids. That means many,many MORE CELLS ARE 'BECOMING THE VIRUS'. The best illustration of this fact are autopsy pictures of tissues immunologically stained for the presence of SPike protein. Apparently, the SPike production continues even after the death!??? That goes beyond what any normal human could stand, literally. My last post is about that:

https://mejbcart.substack.com/p/synthetic-modified-mrna-a-new-tomorrow

Expand full comment

Thank you for breaking this down. The scientific papers are difficult to interpret for the layperson and not easy to share with people who remain stubbornly unaware of concerns about the shots.

Expand full comment

'“It hasn’t been proven in a clinical trial….because we don’t have time to do a clinical trial!” There was no pushback to this absurdity.'

Every time I think our world has strayed as far from what makes sense as possible, I'm proven wrong. At this point, I can only hope that I will wake up soon from this apparent nightmare.

Expand full comment

And yet... reading Facebook comments on the page of a quadruple vaccinated now covid positive friend, commenters saying how glad they were for the vaccine because it “saved them” from severe illness. Astounding.

Expand full comment

Wow, thank you for this summary. It’s so helpful as I’m compiling my list of data and studies to present up my husband. These references studies are very helpful as well. Thank you

Expand full comment

In this paper, These are all the things that would have been addressed to some various extent , if these mRNA inocula had not been pushed into clinical human trials and marketed in the fashion that they were: inadequate or nonexistent animal studies, pharmacodynamics and distribution data, long term(more than 2-6 weeks) observations, etc. Even with reasonable time frames for some vaccines , (like rotavirus vax), intusseception was not discovered until quite a while after the injections in infants began. So be prepared for many adverse events. The big difference now, is that adverse events are willfully ignored and covered up.

Expand full comment

Thanks for your effort and information. I wiil share this.

Expand full comment

"A recent early-release study has found that the mRNA in the COVID-19 vaccines can be detected long after the vaccine is administered. It continues to make spike glycoprotein up to sixty days post-vaccination (Röltgen et al., 2022)."

Should this be "at least sixty days?" Sometimes these durations reflect that the study was stopped, e.g., after sixty days.

Expand full comment
Sep 15, 2022·edited Sep 15, 2022

Thank you for this piece of work on summarizing the paper. The research is of great value - if only the authors could get notice taken of it from the people who should be taking notice!

My particular interest is to do with blood transfusions, the spike protein, its persistence, and cellular damage. Although I'm not a science person, I'm in physical education and therefore understand enough about the human body to understand enough of the relevant science.

In the UK, when a person donates blood, they are not asked about their vaccination status - if they've been vaccinated, with which vaccine, how many doses, if they've had adverse reactions. They are just asked if they've had Covid. I wrote to ask this of the NHS Blood Transfusion Service. They also trotted out the line about the body expelling the mRNA soon after vaccination.

As an unvaccinated person, in the event of an emergency, I do not want a blood transfusion from a Covid vaccinated person. I have had my doctor put this on my medical record. Vaccination information should be collected from blood donors- it would not take much extra effort. However, I suppose it would be tantamount to an admission on the authorities' part that there might be a problem!

Leaving aside all the growing scientific body of evidence that there could be a problem with this, there is also the question of ethics and my right to choose my treatment. There is also much evidence from embalmers in the US, who have found very strange blood clots in vaccinated dead peoples' blood vessels, the likes of which have never been seen before. Doctors have noticed also that, in the vaccinated, red blood corpuscles are clumping together to make clots.

I shall continue to write to the Blood Transfusion Service until, hopefully, I get satisfaction.

Let's hope we don't have another scandal as we had with HIV-infected blood...

Expand full comment

Thank you Phil for a sterling effort.

Expand full comment