8 Comments

When the 'Obamacare' healthcare act was passed in America, the federal healthcare system changed the manner in which healthcare statistics were kept in the United States in order that no meaningful comparisons could be made. Furthermore, all "the good stuff" in the legislation took place immediately, while the more costly provisions (such as taxing to pay for all this) wouldn't kick in until after Obama left office.

The U. S. congress plays similar tricks. Required to balance the costs and benefits over ten years, legislation has been passed under which the benefits are rolled out over the first nine years, then "miraculously" a taxation solution will be found during the tenth year.

There are countless examples of this in the United States political sphere in recent years, and both sides play it. I won't belabor the point. The time and place for having to prove yourself right has long since passed in in the political sphere. Nowadays, the burden of proof has been passed to the public to prove a governmental narrative wrong...

...then putting up barriers to prevent the public from discovering the sordid truth, no holds barred. These are indeed daunting odds that you are up against. Skeletons have quite literally been buried to hide the Covid malfeasance, and buried deeply in hopes no one will ever find them.

Thanks for following the $$$ and connecting the dots.

Expand full comment

When $$$ is more important than people's health, we have a serious problem. Please continue to inform the public.

Expand full comment

Thank you so much for this information. You are appreciated more than you know.

Expand full comment

Have you seen this preprint: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4072489 ? Author interviewed here: https://unherd.com/thepost/study-into-mrna/

Pfizer data shows no all-cause mortality benefit from vaccine in their own initial trial.

Expand full comment

Great article Phil. Thank you so much

Expand full comment

Great article! One minor thing: I don't think Gates is saying that he made a 20 to 1 PROFIT from his foundation investment in vaccines, but rather that the economic benefits to the world were 20 times greater than the donation. Please check into this so that you can correct it if necessary before someone else points it out and paints you as a crank.

Expand full comment

As I understand it, Gates was talking about the returns on investment for society and the world as a whole, not himself.

Expand full comment