27 Comments

Excellent. Very well written. I am going to keep a copy of this to pass on to those who tell me I 'must have been looking at the wrong websites' when I say the vaccine is not safe.

Expand full comment

Phil this is excellent. I am going to print it out and distribute it. Thank you.

Expand full comment
author

There are a few updates on the online version so please use that. Thanks caroline.

Expand full comment

This piece is beyond nonsense. How can any person who has a modicum of critical thinking skills and even an iota of historical and contextual understanding of these pandemic scams- stretching back over three decades- characterize what we have been and are going through as some people or institutions were just "wrong"- somehow they didn't know what they were doing. Good grief this is beyond the pale to think that this was the case.

There was no pandemic and no unique viral pathogen, there was mass murder in hospitals, data fraud, make-believe "cases" and a mass media propaganda event catapulted at the behest of the financiers who run the show. There is nothing new about "COVID" except the scale of the operation.

We just went through the largest mass racketeering operation in the world and somehow those who orchestrated it just made some "mistakes." Gimme a break.

Expand full comment
Apr 16·edited Apr 17

Many thanks for this Phil, I've saved it for future reference since I'm sure I'm not the only one who sometimes gets overwhelmed with the many studies showing how dangerous the mRNA/DNA 'vaccines' have been, so this is great as a reminder

Expand full comment
Apr 16Liked by Phil Harper

Brilliant piece, Phil. Will share widely. Correct “in plane sight” to “in plain sight” and it will be perfectly brilliant. Thank you!

Expand full comment

I like your "You'd have to ignore..." approach. The data has been out there, but the dilemma is how to penetrate people's resistance to it.

Expand full comment

Wow! Just wow!!! Like other commenters, this goldmine of information in one place will be saved to share and refer to in the future. Thank you for your deep digging and for an eloquent presentation of the facts.

Expand full comment

Excellent! 👏

Expand full comment

Wow, great summary but as you know you missed a lot of other studies and evidence of the risks associated with the mRNA / LNP technology. The real question you are asking is why did this mass vaccination slaughter happen, and what makes humans so vulnerable to literally harming and/or killing themselves voluntarily? I will add a question, given we know for certain that many health professionals knew the potential harms and deaths that would occur from mass mRNA vaccination, but did not say a word of warning, what does that tell us about human nature and the state of civilization?????

Expand full comment

This is fantastic, thank you!! I will do as Patricia and pass it to a few friends and family members who haven’t completely awakened yet!

Expand full comment

Prof. Dr. Christian Müller states “there is slight heart muscle cell damage at just under three percent, which should not be overestimated, but should not be ignored either.” I know this is a very serious subject but on reading it I gave between a laugh and a scream. This is like saying you are slightly pregnant, this wonderful organ pumps blood non stop to the rest of your body and we hope will last us until the day we die, slight damage can have very serious consequences and there can be a knock-on effect for the rest of your organs not just the heart. This cavalier/dismissive attitude frightens me the most, how many healthy people will have chronic ill health because of this crazy frenzy of trying to inject every man, woman and child against a virus that would have had little impact on them. Should not be overestimated? You have one life and to think it may be cut short because of this appalling experimentation is a truly awful prospect.

Expand full comment

"Most of us played a role in constructing this behemoth, so most of us have some responsibility in taking it apart." | "Well-intentioned people and institutions can make mistakes, and that the best way to move forward is by confronting uncomfortable truths and working together to find solutions."

Really? I don't think I have read such fatuous generalisation, or pernicious pecksniffian virtue-signalling since the Atlantic article, 'Let’s Declare a Pandemic Amnesty; Let’s focus on the future, and fix the problems we still need to solve'. Emily Oster.

In fact, this appears a prime exemplar of 'circling the drain'.

Expand full comment

It was only a pandemic of fear because stupid people were fearful! The truth hurts…I get it!!!

Expand full comment

Indeed. Regrettably though, the truth will remain meaningless to most until it is probably too late.

Expand full comment

A sad but likely true statement!

Expand full comment

Fantastic overview of the willfully-blind Orwellian world we have been living in

Expand full comment

An article to keep to hand!

Expand full comment

This is an excellent article. It is well-designed to persuade in a rational manner those who are still lost in the welter of misinformation produced by the mainstream media operating under the distorting influence of mass fear, money and government threats. It aligns well with the material put out by The Ethical Skeptic, as found, for example, here:

https://theethicalskeptic.com/2024/04/16/the-state-of-things-pandemic-week-50-2023/. Though The Ethical Skeptic is brilliantly penetrating I find your article easier to understand.

Expand full comment

I’m genuinely interested in what you have to say about this article Phil. Have they got it wrong? If so what are they missing

https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/clinical/modelling-reveals-number-of-lives-saved-by-covid-v

Expand full comment
author

'modelling'

Expand full comment

It made a peer reviewed paper though. I’m guessing you’re saying the modelling is wrong? If so how?

Expand full comment

Modelling has a lot to answer for. I would love to hear your perspective on it Phil.

Expand full comment

I don’t think he’s going to answer. Not that I hold it against him, it would take a lot of work and detailed analysis to critique their modelling. But suffice to say, the authors of that article either genuinely believe that the vaccines are safe or they’re corrupt in one way or another.

Goes to show how evidence is often hard to interpret and rarely (if ever) definitive

Expand full comment