What about allowing collaboration to make cases stronger and stronger ? There could be for example a button to submit new sources to the case owner. And, perhaps, allowing multiple owners would be a way to create working teams on a given subject.
By the way, collaboration could also prevent too many cases to appear on the same subject...
Could I suggest that case ideas might be crowdsourced, and then curated, and then the evidence further crowdsourced? Each case would need a curator for that particular case, perhaps the person who nominated it. The main point being that the hive mind will find all kinds evidence and also generate interest. Some light hearted cases could be amusing, in amongst the life and death matters.
This tool seems to have a great potential !
What about allowing collaboration to make cases stronger and stronger ? There could be for example a button to submit new sources to the case owner. And, perhaps, allowing multiple owners would be a way to create working teams on a given subject.
By the way, collaboration could also prevent too many cases to appear on the same subject...
Could I suggest that case ideas might be crowdsourced, and then curated, and then the evidence further crowdsourced? Each case would need a curator for that particular case, perhaps the person who nominated it. The main point being that the hive mind will find all kinds evidence and also generate interest. Some light hearted cases could be amusing, in amongst the life and death matters.
I'd like to make the case. "Vaccines cause autism." And use Mr. Kirsch's substack article for the source.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/vaers-data-shows-that-vaccines-cause