8 Comments

Precisely why I won't label AI good or evil. I consider it a way to process information. There are many constructs that do so. Just a matter of intent and the possibility of misuse - either intentional or inadvertently.

Expand full comment
Mar 12Liked by Phil Harper

Great work, Digger! I can see applications of this in a 'panocracy' that I'm working on myself.

This, and your case.science project, is exactly the kind of AI that will help put control of our lives back where it belongs - to us.

Expand full comment
Mar 12·edited Mar 12

You should look at Mathew Crawford's substack. He does a kind of mapping that is incredible. I wonder if you two, fighting the good fight, could utilize your skills to empower your platforms even more. I live your work. Thanks for what you do.

Expand full comment

This is a great use for AI and graphs.

Andrew Hill admitted to Tess Lawrie that Unitaid had an interest in his paper the false conclusions of which were used to retard Ivermectin but it is NOT DECLARED in the paper. You need to add a mechanism to include associations thought other sources. Collecting data from LinkedIn even if manually could improve the data set.

Expand full comment

doesn't seem to spawn anything for me, using these DOIs for example https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03653-6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03275-y. but it's an absolutely awesome concept! this is an ideal addition to synapse.patsnap.com and aminer.org, do you know other pharma-AI sites? the former doesnt seem to give much of a damn about GDPR laws as far as i can tell.

Expand full comment

I like it, it may not be enough for some to get the drift but it one less brick in the wall.

Expand full comment